Company Analysis H&R Real Estate Investment Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (6.91 $) is less than fair price (7.31 $)
- Dividends (6.71%) are higher than the sector average (5.52%).
- The stock's return over the last year (9.46%) is higher than the sector average (3.62%).
- Current debt level 33.33% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 44.27%.
Disadvantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.97%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=2.15%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| H&R Real Estate Investment Trust | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.5% | -13.3% | 0.6% |
| 90 days | -4.1% | -0.8% | -4.3% |
| 1 year | 9.5% | 3.6% | 9.3% |
HRUFF vs Sector: H&R Real Estate Investment Trust has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 5.84% over the past year.
HRUFF vs Market: H&R Real Estate Investment Trust has outperformed the market by 0.1791% over the past year.
Stable price: HRUFF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: HRUFF with weekly volatility of 0.182% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (6.91 $) is lower than the fair price (7.31 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (6.91 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 5.8%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (42.22) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (30.34).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (42.22) is lower than that of the market as a whole (53.47).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.4931) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.15).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.4931) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.34).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.19) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.78).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.19) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.74).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-172.21) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (116.64).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-172.21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.31).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -17.18% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-17.18%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-48.32%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.97%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.15%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.97%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.79%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-0.9616%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.15%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-0.9616%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.49%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.91%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.03%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 6.71% is higher than the average for the sector '5.52%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 6.71% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.64.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 6.71% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (366.29%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
