Company Analysis Frasers Centrepoint Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (11.94%) is higher than the sector average (4.92%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=4.12%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=3.95%)
Disadvantages
- Price (1.85 $) is higher than fair price (0.9042 $)
- Dividends (4.25%) are below the sector average (5.64%).
- Current debt level 31.72% has increased over 5 years from 28.81%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Frasers Centrepoint Trust | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0% | -4.4% | 0.8% |
| 90 days | 17.3% | 3.1% | 7.2% |
| 1 year | 11.9% | 4.9% | 12.2% |
FRZCF vs Sector: Frasers Centrepoint Trust has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 7.02% over the past year.
FRZCF vs Market: Frasers Centrepoint Trust has underperformed the market marginally by -0.2541% over the past year.
Stable price: FRZCF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FRZCF with weekly volatility of 0.2296% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1.85 $) is higher than the fair price (0.9042 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1.85 $) is 51.1% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (25.51) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (29.78).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (25.51) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.99).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.21) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.16).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.41).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (14.33) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.96).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (14.33) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.65).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (25.39) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (127.9).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (25.39) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.09).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 0.1978% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0.1978%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-30.48%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (4.12%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.95%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (4.12%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.13%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.62%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.77%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.62%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.31%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.91%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.01%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 4.25% is below the average for the sector '5.64%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 4.25% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.86.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 4.25% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (105.28%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
