Company Analysis Birkenstock Holding plc
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (3.23%) is higher than the sector average (-19.92%).
Disadvantages
- Price (51.51 $) is higher than fair price (15.29 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.27%).
- Current debt level 27.64% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.63%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=30.79%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Birkenstock Holding plc | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -4.5% | 4.5% | 0% |
90 days | 7.3% | -19.9% | 17.7% |
1 year | 3.2% | -19.9% | 11.4% |
BIRK vs Sector: Birkenstock Holding plc has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 23.15% over the past year.
BIRK vs Market: Birkenstock Holding plc has significantly underperformed the market by -8.22% over the past year.
Stable price: BIRK is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "New York Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: BIRK with weekly volatility of 0.062% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (51.51 $) is higher than the fair price (15.29 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (51.51 $) is 70.3% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (44.21) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (17.44).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (44.21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (61.84).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.23) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.7).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.23) is lower than that of the market as a whole (20.59).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (4.69) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.63).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (4.69) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.97).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (18.79) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.7).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (18.79) is higher than that of the market as a whole (18.41).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -56.08% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-56.08%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.63%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (30.79%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.63%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (42.62%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.95%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.56%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.95%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.26%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.4167%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.15%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.27%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription