Red Robin Gourmet Burgers

Yield per half year: -36.04%
Dividend yield: 0%
Sector: Consumer Discretionary

Company Analysis Red Robin Gourmet Burgers

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • The stock's return over the last year (44.9%) is higher than the sector average (-11.02%).
  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=148.1%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=4.84%)

Disadvantages

  • Price (4.26 $) is higher than fair price (3.84 $)
  • Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.7556%).
  • Current debt level 90.19% has increased over 5 years from 70.91%.

Similar companies

TripAdvisor

Marriott International

Expedia Group

Frontier Communications

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.3. Market efficiency

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers Consumer Discretionary Index
7 days 1.2% 0.1% -0.1%
90 days -35% -3.4% 2.1%
1 year 44.9% -11% 19.8%

RRGB vs Sector: Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 55.92% over the past year.

RRGB vs Market: Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has outperformed the market by 25.09% over the past year.

Stable price: RRGB is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: RRGB with weekly volatility of 0.8634% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: -1.25
P/S: 0.0686

3.2. Revenue

EPS -4.93
ROE 148.1%
ROA -11.21%
ROIC -4.72%
Ebitda margin 0.4305%

5. Fundamental Analysis

5.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Above fair price: The current price (4.26 $) is higher than the fair price (3.84 $).

Price is higher than fair: The current price (4.26 $) is 9.9% higher than the fair price.

5.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-1.25) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.47).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-1.25) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-68.72).

5.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-1.02) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.77).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-1.02) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.39).

5.5. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.0686) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.43).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.0686) is lower than that of the market as a whole (148.63).

5.5.1 P/S Similar companies

5.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (117.83) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (18.75).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (117.83) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-95.22).

6. Profitability

6.1. Profitability and revenue

6.2. Earnings per share - EPS

6.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 11.02% over the last 5 years.

Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (11.02%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-71.1%).

6.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (148.1%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.84%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (148.1%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-6.23%).

6.6. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-11.21%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.51%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-11.21%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.59%).

6.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-4.72%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.53%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-4.72%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.66%).

7. Finance

7.1. Assets and debt

Debt Level: (90.19%) is a bit high in relation to assets.

Increasing debt: over 5 years, the debt has increased from 70.91% to 90.19%.

Excess of debt: The debt is not covered by net income, percentage -745.9%.

7.2. Profit growth and share price

8. Dividends

8.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.7556%.

8.2. Stability and increase in payments

Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

8.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.

9. Insider trades

9.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 100% over the last 3 months.

9.2. Latest transactions

Transaction date Insider Type Price Volume Quantity
24.03.2025 Wilson Joshua Todd
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Sale 4.16 3 877 932
24.03.2025 Mussetter Sarah A.
CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER
Sale 4.16 3 823 919
24.03.2025 Hart Gerard Johan
PRESIDENT AND CEO
Sale 4.16 35 888 8 627
21.03.2025 Wilson Joshua Todd
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Sale 4.16 4 680 1 125
21.03.2025 Mussetter Sarah A.
CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER
Sale 4.16 4 609 1 108

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription