Company Analysis RMG Acquisition Corp. III
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (9.75 $) is less than fair price (59.78 $)
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.38%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=6.45%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.31%).
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is lower than the sector average (17.86%).
- Current debt level 0.1026% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
RMG Acquisition Corp. III | Financials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 0% | -24.1% | 0.8% |
90 days | 0% | 3.9% | 31.6% |
1 year | 0% | 17.9% | 15.8% |
RMGC vs Sector: RMG Acquisition Corp. III has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -17.86% over the past year.
RMGC vs Market: RMG Acquisition Corp. III has significantly underperformed the market by -15.79% over the past year.
Stable price: RMGC is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: RMGC with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (9.75 $) is lower than the fair price (59.78 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (9.75 $) is 513.1% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (3.57) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.68).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (3.57) is lower than that of the market as a whole (90.03).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.2593) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.7).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.2593) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.39).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.61).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.12).
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-55.67) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.61).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-55.67) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.91).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 7375.5% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (7375.5%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.44%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.38%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.45%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.38%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (6.99%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.1%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (6.99%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.05%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.08%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.31%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription