NASDAQ: LULU - Lululemon Athletica

Yield per half year: +52.5%
Dividend yield: 0.00%
Sector: Consumer Discretionary

Company Analysis Lululemon Athletica

Download the report: word Word pdf PDF

1. Summary

Advantages

  • The stock's return over the last year (-13.9%) is higher than the sector average (-15.84%).
  • The company's current efficiency (ROE=42.01%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-22.73%)

Disadvantages

  • Price (395.16 $) is higher than fair price (168.87 $)
  • Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.3928%).
  • Current debt level 19.79% has increased over 5 years from 0%.

Similar companies

Ross Stores

Marriott International

Copart

eBay

2. Share price and performance

2.1. Share price

2.2. News

2.3. Market efficiency

Lululemon Athletica Consumer Discretionary Index
7 days -4% -0.7% -1.9%
90 days 19.7% -16% 2.7%
1 year -13.9% -15.8% 26.1%

LULU vs Sector: Lululemon Athletica has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 1.93% over the past year.

LULU vs Market: Lululemon Athletica has significantly underperformed the market by -39.98% over the past year.

Stable price: LULU is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.

Long period: LULU with weekly volatility of -0.2674% over the past year.

3. Summary of the report

3.1. General

P/E: 39.51
P/S: 6.37

3.2. Revenue

EPS 12.2
ROE 42.01%
ROA 24.41%
ROIC 27.95%
Ebitda margin 26.89%

4. Fundamental Analysis

4.1. Stock price and price forecast

The fair price is calculated taking into account the Central Bank refinancing rate and earnings per share (EPS)

Above fair price: The current price (395.16 $) is higher than the fair price (168.87 $).

Price is higher than fair: The current price (395.16 $) is 57.3% higher than the fair price.

4.2. P/E

P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (39.51) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.72).

P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (39.51) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.48).

4.2.1 P/E Similar companies

4.3. P/BV

P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (14.47) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.4319).

P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (14.47) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.44).

4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies

4.4. P/S

P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (6.37) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.81).

P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (6.37) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.3).

4.4.1 P/S Similar companies

4.5. EV/Ebitda

EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (23.35) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (17.87).

EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (23.35) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.6).

5. Profitability

5.1. Profitability and revenue

5.2. Earnings per share - EPS

5.3. Past profitability Net Income

Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 28.02% over the last 5 years.

Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (28.02%).

Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (93.41%).

5.4. ROE

ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (42.01%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-22.73%).

ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (42.01%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (8.95%).

5.5. ROA

ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (24.41%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.41%).

ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (24.41%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.3%).

5.6. ROIC

ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (27.95%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.46%).

ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (27.95%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).

6. Finance

6.1. Assets and debt

Debt level: (19.79%) is quite low in relation to assets.

Increasing debt: over 5 years, the debt has increased from 0% to 19.79%.

Debt Covering: The debt is covered by 90.52% from net profit.

6.2. Profit growth and share price

7. Dividends

7.1. Dividend yield vs Market

Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.3928%.

7.2. Stability and increase in payments

Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.

Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.

7.3. Payout percentage

Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (2.8%) are at an uncomfortable level.

8. Insider trades

8.1. Insider trading

Insider Buying Exceeds insider sales by 6.84% over the last 3 months.

8.2. Latest transactions

Transaction date Insider Type Price Volume Quantity
26.12.2024 NEUBURGER NICOLE
Chief Brand Officer
Sale 387.11 782 736 2 022
26.12.2024 NEUBURGER NICOLE
Chief Brand Officer
Purchase 289.64 585 652 2 022
26.12.2024 NICOLE NEUBURGER
Officer
Purchase 387.11 782 736 2 022
09.12.2024 CELESTE BURGOYNE
Officer
Purchase 405.88 9 160 710 22 570
09.12.2024 MEGHAN FRANK
Officer
Purchase 415.77 906 794 2 181

Pay for your subscription

More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription

9. Stocks forum Lululemon Athletica

9.3. Comments