MAX Chat
Company Analysis Keurig Green Mountain
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0 $) is less than fair price (41.4 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (35.08%) is higher than the sector average (0%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=15.66%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=14.17%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.527%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Keurig Green Mountain | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0.4% | -48.5% | 0.8% |
| 90 days | 2.8% | 2.2% | 31.6% |
| 1 year | 35.1% | 0% | 15.9% |
KPP vs Sector: Keurig Green Mountain has outperformed the "Healthcare" sector by 35.08% over the past year.
KPP vs Market: Keurig Green Mountain has outperformed the market by 19.21% over the past year.
Stable price: KPP is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: KPP with weekly volatility of 0.6746% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0 $) is lower than the fair price (41.4 $).
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (30.5) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (64.15).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (30.5) is lower than that of the market as a whole (90.03).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (5.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.96).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (5.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.39).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (32.77).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.12).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (274.79).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.91).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-15.75%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (15.66%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (14.17%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (15.66%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.64%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (10.75%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.18%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (10.75%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (13.72%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.63%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (13.72%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.08%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.527%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.43.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (38.2%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
