Company Analysis Keurig Green Mountain
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0 $) is less than fair price (46.32 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (14.88%) is higher than the sector average (-48.78%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.5325%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=15.66%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=103.63%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Keurig Green Mountain | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0.7% | 49.9% | -0.1% |
| 90 days | -0% | -47.5% | 5% |
| 1 year | 14.9% | -48.8% | 22.1% |
KPP vs Sector: Keurig Green Mountain has outperformed the "Healthcare" sector by 63.66% over the past year.
KPP vs Market: Keurig Green Mountain has significantly underperformed the market by -7.25% over the past year.
Stable price: KPP is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: KPP with weekly volatility of 0.2861% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0 $) is lower than the fair price (46.32 $).
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (30.5) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-274.25).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (30.5) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-80.39).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (5.4) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (256.7).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (5.4) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.71).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (56.99).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (136.99).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.51).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-47.74).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-22.73%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (15.66%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (103.63%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (15.66%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-10.18%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (10.75%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-2.84%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (10.75%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (39.54%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (13.72%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.17%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (13.72%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (8.78%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.5325%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.43.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (38.2%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
