MAX
Company Analysis Fossil Group, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (232.27%) is higher than the sector average (-20.58%).
Disadvantages
- Price (4.69 $) is higher than fair price (2.67 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.61%).
- Current debt level 41.36% has increased over 5 years from 15.38%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-50.96%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=3.85%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Fossil Group, Inc. | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0.3% | -7.5% | -1.5% |
| 90 days | 25.9% | -5.6% | 0.7% |
| 1 year | 232.3% | -20.6% | 13.2% |
FOSL vs Sector: Fossil Group, Inc. has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 252.85% over the past year.
FOSL vs Market: Fossil Group, Inc. has outperformed the market by 219.07% over the past year.
Stable price: FOSL is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FOSL with weekly volatility of 4.47% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (4.69 $) is higher than the fair price (2.67 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (4.69 $) is 43.1% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-0.93) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.6).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-0.93) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-87.32).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.69) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.72).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.69) is lower than that of the market as a whole (83.29).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.0819) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.61).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.0819) is lower than that of the market as a whole (115.2).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-3.44) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.17).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-3.44) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-92.19).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -102.14% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-102.14%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (238.35%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-50.96%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.85%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-50.96%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-6.66%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-11.79%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.4%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-11.79%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (37.94%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (4.84%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.5%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (4.84%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.35%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.61%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (52.01%) are at a comfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
