MAX
Company Analysis Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (19.14 $) is less than fair price (19.68 $)
- Dividends (6.8%) are higher than the sector average (2.56%).
- The stock's return over the last year (8.63%) is higher than the sector average (-40.21%).
Disadvantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.3%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=20.04%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0.4% | 0% | -1.2% |
| 90 days | -2.3% | -14.2% | -3.5% |
| 1 year | 8.6% | -40.2% | 17.8% |
CSQ vs Sector: Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 48.84% over the past year.
CSQ vs Market: Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has significantly underperformed the market by -9.16% over the past year.
Stable price: CSQ is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CSQ with weekly volatility of 0.17% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (19.14 $) is lower than the fair price (19.68 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (19.14 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 2.8%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-76.55) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-235.93).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-76.55) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-87.32).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.04) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (72.81).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.04) is lower than that of the market as a whole (82.22).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (31.21) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (261.09).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (31.21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (115.2).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-241.78).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-82.75).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (1025.4%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.04%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-6.94%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.71%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.4%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.71%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (37.49%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.81%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.35%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 6.8% is higher than the average for the sector '2.56%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 6.8% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 6.8% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
