Company Analysis Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (18.49 $) is less than fair price (18.73 $)
- Dividends (7.34%) are higher than the sector average (2.68%).
- The stock's return over the last year (4.44%) is higher than the sector average (-17.82%).
Disadvantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-1.3%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=6.45%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund | Financials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 1.5% | 1% | 2.8% |
90 days | 5.2% | -23.2% | 14% |
1 year | 4.4% | -17.8% | 23.6% |
CSQ vs Sector: Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 22.26% over the past year.
CSQ vs Market: Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has significantly underperformed the market by -19.17% over the past year.
Stable price: CSQ is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CSQ with weekly volatility of 0.0854% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (18.49 $) is lower than the fair price (18.73 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (18.49 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 1.3%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.68).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (90.14).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.04) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.7).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.04) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.2).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.61).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.13).
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.67).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.93).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.44%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.45%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-1.3%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.66%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.71%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.12%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.71%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.89%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.51%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.08%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 7.34% is higher than the average for the sector '2.68%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 7.34% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.86.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 7.34% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription