Company Analysis Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (6.6 $) is less than fair price (7.11 $)
- Dividends (8.84%) are higher than the sector average (1.73%).
- The stock's return over the last year (4.27%) is higher than the sector average (-42.28%).
Disadvantages
- Current debt level 20.69% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-5.46%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=6.37%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.2% | -5.5% | 4.1% |
| 90 days | -7.6% | -12.7% | -8.9% |
| 1 year | 4.3% | -42.3% | 11.3% |
CHW vs Sector: Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 46.54% over the past year.
CHW vs Market: Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund has significantly underperformed the market by -7.01% over the past year.
Stable price: CHW is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "NASDAQ" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CHW with weekly volatility of 0.082% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (6.6 $) is lower than the fair price (7.11 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (6.6 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 7.7%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (2.34) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.78).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (2.34) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.7).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.89) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.5943).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.89) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.42).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.34) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.23).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.34) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.24).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.38).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.23).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -28.07% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-28.07%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-20.64%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-5.46%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.37%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-5.46%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.97%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-0.04%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.98%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-0.04%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.31%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.05%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 8.84% is higher than the average for the sector '1.73%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 8.84% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 8.84% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (28.47%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
