MAX
Company Analysis Life Insurance Company Of Alabama
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (5%) are higher than the sector average (4.66%).
Disadvantages
- Price (9.75 $) is higher than fair price (9.52 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (21.88%) is lower than the sector average (24.82%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=19.46%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Life Insurance Company Of Alabama | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -0.2% | -0.8% |
| 90 days | -2.5% | -16.6% | 3.2% |
| 1 year | 21.9% | 24.8% | 12.3% |
LINSA vs Sector: Life Insurance Company Of Alabama has slightly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -2.94% over the past year.
LINSA vs Market: Life Insurance Company Of Alabama has outperformed the market by 9.53% over the past year.
Stable price: LINSA is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "USA Stocks" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LINSA with weekly volatility of 0.42% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (9.75 $) is higher than the fair price (9.52 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (9.75 $) is 2.4% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.63).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (134.58).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.75).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.79).
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.44).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.3).
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-7.53).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.19).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-69.13%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.46%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (189.16%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.5%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (164.88%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.35%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 5% is higher than the average for the sector '4.66%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 5% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 5% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
