MAX
Company Analysis Lancashire Holdings Ltd
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (8.6 $) is less than fair price (8.68 $)
- Dividends (16.29%) are higher than the sector average (4.66%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=21.41%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=19.46%)
Disadvantages
- The stock's return over the last year (16.73%) is lower than the sector average (29.09%).
- Current debt level 10.71% has increased over 5 years from 9.3%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Lancashire Holdings Ltd | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 3% | 0% | -0.8% |
| 90 days | 16.1% | -13.8% | 3.6% |
| 1 year | 16.7% | 29.1% | 12.3% |
LCSHF vs Sector: Lancashire Holdings Ltd has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -12.35% over the past year.
LCSHF vs Market: Lancashire Holdings Ltd has outperformed the market by 4.39% over the past year.
Stable price: LCSHF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "USA Stocks" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LCSHF with weekly volatility of 0.32% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (8.6 $) is lower than the fair price (8.68 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (8.6 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 0.9%.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (7.99) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.53).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (7.99) is lower than that of the market as a whole (134.59).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.72) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.75).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.72) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.76).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.72) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.42).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.72) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.17).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.33) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-7.53).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.33) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.87).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -123.31% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-123.31%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-69.13%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (21.41%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (19.46%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (21.41%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (183.1%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (7.76%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.5%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (7.76%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (164.88%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.35%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 16.29% is higher than the average for the sector '4.66%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 16.29% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 16.29% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (110.89%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
