Company Analysis Kongsberg Automotive ASA
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.16 $) is less than fair price (0.163 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0%).
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is lower than the sector average (0%).
- Current debt level 34.2% has increased over 5 years from 31.75%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-8.81%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=0%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Kongsberg Automotive ASA | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -12.5% | -0.7% | 3.5% |
90 days | -12.5% | 19.1% | 10.7% |
1 year | 0% | 0% | 12.7% |
KGAUF vs Sector: Kongsberg Automotive ASA has slightly underperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 0% over the past year.
KGAUF vs Market: Kongsberg Automotive ASA has significantly underperformed the market by -12.66% over the past year.
Stable price: KGAUF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "USA Stocks" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: KGAUF with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.16 $) is lower than the fair price (0.163 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (0.16 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 1.9%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is higher than that of the market as a whole (0).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5551) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5551) is higher than that of the market as a whole (0).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.143) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.143) is higher than that of the market as a whole (0).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.42) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.42) is higher than that of the market as a whole (0).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -16.93% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-16.93%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-8.81%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-8.81%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-2.75%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-2.75%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription