Company Analysis Integral Diagnostics Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Current debt level 10.14% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 28.53%.
Disadvantages
- Price (1 $) is higher than fair price (0.11 $)
- Dividends (2.13%) are below the sector average (592.52%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-52.38%) is lower than the sector average (-5.57%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0.67%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=9.99%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Integral Diagnostics Limited | Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | 0.2% | -1.8% |
| 90 days | 0% | 1% | 2% |
| 1 year | -52.4% | -5.6% | 11.9% |
ITGDF vs Sector: Integral Diagnostics Limited has significantly underperformed the "" sector by -46.82% over the past year.
ITGDF vs Market: Integral Diagnostics Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -64.28% over the past year.
Stable price: ITGDF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "USA Stocks" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: ITGDF with weekly volatility of -1.01% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1 $) is higher than the fair price (0.11 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1 $) is 89% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (79.65) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (231.08).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (79.65) is lower than that of the market as a whole (139.92).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.54) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.54).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.54) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.9).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.59) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.89).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.59) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.38).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.15).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.33).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -17.01% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-17.01%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0.67%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.99%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0.67%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (187.53%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.33%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.43%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.33%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (170.29%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.35%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.13% is below the average for the sector '592.52%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.13% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.9.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.13% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 3 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (330.77%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
