MAX
Company Analysis Famous Brands Ltd ADR
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (6.6 $) is less than fair price (11.5 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (13.6%) is higher than the sector average (-1.57%).
- Current debt level 39.51% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 424.2%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=46.58%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=9.12%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (5.81%) are below the sector average (9.47%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Famous Brands Ltd ADR | Consumer Discretionary | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | 0.5% | -1.3% |
| 90 days | 0% | -8.2% | -2.2% |
| 1 year | 13.6% | -1.6% | 12% |
FMBRY vs Sector: Famous Brands Ltd ADR has outperformed the "Consumer Discretionary" sector by 15.17% over the past year.
FMBRY vs Market: Famous Brands Ltd ADR has outperformed the market by 1.61% over the past year.
Stable price: FMBRY is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "USA Stocks" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FMBRY with weekly volatility of 0.26% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (6.6 $) is lower than the fair price (11.5 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (6.6 $) is 74.2% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0.6) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.19).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0.6) is lower than that of the market as a whole (134.59).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.28) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.37).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.28) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.76).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.04) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.81).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.04) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.17).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.49) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.69).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (5.49) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.87).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -165.97% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-165.97%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (46.58%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (9.12%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (46.58%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (183.1%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (15.05%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.74%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (15.05%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (164.88%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.35%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 5.81% is below the average for the sector '9.47%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 5.81% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 5.81% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (57.4%) are at a comfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
