Company Analysis Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Investor Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.05 $) is less than fair price (0.48 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (25%) is higher than the sector average (22.72%).
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.26%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=559.18%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Investor Inc. | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | 0.8% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | -16.7% | 6.9% | 1.6% |
| 1 year | 25% | 22.7% | 13.4% |
DTLAP vs Sector: Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Investor Inc. has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 2.28% over the past year.
DTLAP vs Market: Brookfield DTLA Fund Office Trust Investor Inc. has outperformed the market by 11.63% over the past year.
Stable price: DTLAP is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "USA Stocks" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: DTLAP with weekly volatility of 0.48% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.05 $) is lower than the fair price (0.48 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.05 $) is 860% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.25).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (141.31).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.15).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.85).
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.0403).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.44).
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.17).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.49).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -20% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-20%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (559.18%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (190.51%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (181.56%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (173.11%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.35%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.26%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.5.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
