MAX
Company Analysis China Renaissance Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (66.17%) is higher than the sector average (26.77%).
- Current debt level 0.4% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 10.85%.
Disadvantages
- Price (0.6 $) is higher than fair price (0.51 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (4.66%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-0.72%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=19.46%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| China Renaissance Holdings Limited | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | 0.1% | -0.8% |
| 90 days | -0.8% | -11.9% | 3.6% |
| 1 year | 66.2% | 26.8% | 12.3% |
CSCHF vs Sector: China Renaissance Holdings Limited has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 39.4% over the past year.
CSCHF vs Market: China Renaissance Holdings Limited has outperformed the market by 53.82% over the past year.
Stable price: CSCHF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "USA Stocks" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CSCHF with weekly volatility of 1.27% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (0.6 $) is higher than the fair price (0.51 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (0.6 $) is 15% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-1.88) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.53).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-1.88) is lower than that of the market as a whole (134.58).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.19) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.75).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.19) is lower than that of the market as a whole (2.79).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.45) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.42).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.45) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.3).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.21) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-7.53).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.19).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -20.31% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-20.31%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-69.13%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-0.72%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.46%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-0.72%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (189.16%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-0.47%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.5%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-0.47%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (164.88%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.35%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '4.66%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.67.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
