Company Analysis Ringer Hut Co.,Ltd.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (2283 Β₯) is higher than fair price (470.19 Β₯)
- Dividends (0.6662%) are below the sector average (3.38%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-5.93%) is lower than the sector average (0.4794%).
- Current debt level 30.56% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=6.08%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=8.11%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Ringer Hut Co.,Ltd. | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.1% | -0% | -0.8% |
| 90 days | -1.2% | -0% | 2.9% |
| 1 year | -5.9% | 0.5% | 17.8% |
8200 vs Sector: Ringer Hut Co.,Ltd. has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -6.4% over the past year.
8200 vs Market: Ringer Hut Co.,Ltd. has significantly underperformed the market by -23.72% over the past year.
Stable price: 8200 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Tokyo Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 8200 with weekly volatility of -0.1139% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (2283 Β₯) is higher than the fair price (470.19 Β₯).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (2283 Β₯) is 79.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (81.68) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (99.25).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (81.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (117.52).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (4.78) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (50.27).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (4.78) is lower than that of the market as a whole (84.1).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.53) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (49.49).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.53) is lower than that of the market as a whole (84.05).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (22.83) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (51.5).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (22.83) is lower than that of the market as a whole (90.51).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -2.03% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (-286.52%) is below the 5-year average return (-2.03%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (-286.52%) is lower than the return for the sector (47.12%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (6.08%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.11%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (6.08%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (7.63%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.62%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.28%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.62%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.88%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-1.26%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.3%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-1.26%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.77%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0.6662% is below the average for the sector '3.38%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0.6662% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0.6662% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (17.39%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
