Company Analysis 3-D Matrix, Ltd.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (133 Β₯) is less than fair price (149.41 Β₯)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.87%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-2.14%) is lower than the sector average (6.13%).
- Current debt level 70.91% has increased over 5 years from 45.23%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-58.2%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=1.13%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| 3-D Matrix, Ltd. | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 1.5% | 0% | 0.3% |
| 90 days | -25.1% | 0% | 3.3% |
| 1 year | -2.1% | 6.1% | -1.6% |
7777 vs Sector: 3-D Matrix, Ltd. has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -8.27% over the past year.
7777 vs Market: 3-D Matrix, Ltd. has underperformed the market marginally by -0.5541% over the past year.
Stable price: 7777 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Tokyo Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 7777 with weekly volatility of -0.0412% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (133 Β₯) is lower than the fair price (149.41 Β₯).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (133 Β₯) is slightly lower than the fair price by 12.3%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (112.46).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (138.33).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (24.68) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (70.29).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (24.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (107.9).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.9) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (75.53).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.9) is lower than that of the market as a whole (108.73).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (195.01) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (29.26).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (195.01) is higher than that of the market as a whole (109.28).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -18.35% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-18.35%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-1.09%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-58.2%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.13%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-58.2%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.37%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-4.36%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.6587%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-4.36%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.45%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (9.07%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.75%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.87%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
