Company Analysis Nomura Real Estate Master Fund, Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (145500 Β₯) is higher than fair price (78970.79 Β₯)
- Dividends (5.13%) are below the sector average (5.52%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-5.64%) is lower than the sector average (3.19%).
- Current debt level 44.06% has increased over 5 years from 43.85%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=5.02%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=8.3%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Nomura Real Estate Master Fund, Inc. | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 2.1% | 0% | -0% |
| 90 days | 2.6% | 0% | 1.7% |
| 1 year | -5.6% | 3.2% | -0.2% |
3462 vs Sector: Nomura Real Estate Master Fund, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Real Estate" sector by -8.83% over the past year.
3462 vs Market: Nomura Real Estate Master Fund, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -5.44% over the past year.
Stable price: 3462 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Tokyo Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 3462 with weekly volatility of -0.1085% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (145500 Β₯) is higher than the fair price (78970.79 Β₯).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (145500 Β₯) is 45.7% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (23.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (164.79).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (23.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (150.15).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (144.84).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.17) is lower than that of the market as a whole (120.08).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (8.42) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (148.36).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (8.42) is lower than that of the market as a whole (120.98).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (23.12) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (158.79).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (23.12) is lower than that of the market as a whole (120.75).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 4.53% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (4.53%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.68%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (5.02%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.3%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (5.02%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.39%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.58%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.69%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.58%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.46%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.47%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.83%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 5.13% is below the average for the sector '5.52%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 5.13% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 5.13% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (96.79%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
