Company Analysis Shenzhen International Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0 Β₯) is less than fair price (5.9 Β₯)
- Dividends (3.92%) are higher than the sector average (1.66%).
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is higher than the sector average (-30.81%).
Disadvantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=3.15%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=10.32%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
Shenzhen International Holdings Limited | Industrials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 0% | 0% | -1.3% |
90 days | 0% | -9.3% | 8% |
1 year | 0% | -30.8% | 19.5% |
0152 vs Sector: Shenzhen International Holdings Limited has outperformed the "Industrials" sector by 30.81% over the past year.
0152 vs Market: Shenzhen International Holdings Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -19.48% over the past year.
Stable price: 0152 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Shenzhen Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 0152 with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0 Β₯) is lower than the fair price (5.9 Β₯).
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (12.11) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (50.6).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (12.11) is lower than that of the market as a whole (63.57).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.73).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.79).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.98) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.35).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.98) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.87).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.39) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (29.63).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.39) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.54).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by 0% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (0%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-7.25%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (3.15%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.32%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (3.15%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.38%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.42%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.84%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.42%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.95%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 3.92% is higher than the average for the sector '1.66%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 3.92% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=1.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 3.92% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (23.15%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription