Company Analysis Shenzhen Zhongjin Lingnan Nonfemet Co. Ltd.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (-25.09%) is higher than the sector average (-28.33%).
- Current debt level 0% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 21.01%.
Disadvantages
- Price (3.97 Β₯) is higher than fair price (3.41 Β₯)
- Dividends (2.14%) are below the sector average (3.22%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.87%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=14.12%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Shenzhen Zhongjin Lingnan Nonfemet Co. Ltd. | Materials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 0% | 2.3% | 4.7% |
90 days | -8.3% | -8.5% | 3.2% |
1 year | -25.1% | -28.3% | 37.3% |
000060 vs Sector: Shenzhen Zhongjin Lingnan Nonfemet Co. Ltd. has outperformed the "Materials" sector by 3.23% over the past year.
000060 vs Market: Shenzhen Zhongjin Lingnan Nonfemet Co. Ltd. has significantly underperformed the market by -62.4% over the past year.
Stable price: 000060 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Shenzhen Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 000060 with weekly volatility of -0.4826% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (3.97 Β₯) is higher than the fair price (3.41 Β₯).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (3.97 Β₯) is 14.1% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (16.64) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (41.15).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (16.64) is lower than that of the market as a whole (63.57).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.78).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.17) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.79).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.35) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.62).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.35) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.87).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (27).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (15.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.54).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 4.12% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (4.12%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.87%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.12%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.87%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (9.38%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (2.54%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.12%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (2.54%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.95%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.14% is below the average for the sector '3.22%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.14% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.86.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.14% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 3 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (33.83%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription