Company Analysis Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=14.56%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=7.78%)
Disadvantages
- Price (30.43 Β₯) is higher than fair price (23.3 Β₯)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (0.3298%).
- The stock's return over the last year (6.92%) is lower than the sector average (44.91%).
- Current debt level 13.61% has increased over 5 years from 13.04%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd. | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.5% | 0.8% | -1% |
| 90 days | 17.5% | 4% | 0.5% |
| 1 year | 6.9% | 44.9% | 26.2% |
603816 vs Sector: Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd. has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -37.99% over the past year.
603816 vs Market: Jason Furniture (Hangzhou) Co.,Ltd. has significantly underperformed the market by -19.29% over the past year.
Stable price: 603816 is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "Shanghai Stock Exchange" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: 603816 with weekly volatility of 0.1331% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (30.43 Β₯) is higher than the fair price (23.3 Β₯).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (30.43 Β₯) is 23.4% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (16.03) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (59.57).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (16.03) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.56).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.25) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.05).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.25) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.26).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.23) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.2).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.23) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.32).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (12.32) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.14).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (12.32) is lower than that of the market as a whole (22.99).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 13.51% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (13.51%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-1.46%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (14.56%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.78%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (14.56%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.11%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (8.27%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.5%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (8.27%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.36%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (0%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '0.3298%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (78.74%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
