Company Analysis Trip.com Group Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (63 $) is less than fair price (110.54 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (44.83%) is higher than the sector average (-0.4058%).
- Current debt level 16.62% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 83.23%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=92.91%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=18.44%)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0.4732%) are below the sector average (3.88%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Trip.com Group Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 0% | -0% | 0.6% |
90 days | -0.6% | -0.9% | 19.2% |
1 year | 44.8% | -0.4% | 14.2% |
TRPCF vs Sector: Trip.com Group Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 45.23% over the past year.
TRPCF vs Market: Trip.com Group Limited has outperformed the market by 30.66% over the past year.
Stable price: TRPCF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: TRPCF with weekly volatility of 0.8621% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (63 $) is lower than the fair price (110.54 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (63 $) is 75.5% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (2.15) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (25.12).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (2.15) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.87) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.67).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.87) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.6901) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.75).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.6901) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (1.8) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.13).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (1.8) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -5263.14% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-5263.14%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.09%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (92.91%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (18.44%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (92.91%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (53.25%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.43%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (53.25%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.14%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0.4732% is below the average for the sector '3.88%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0.4732% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=1.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0.4732% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription