MAX Chat
Company Analysis Smith & Nephew plc
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (2.55%) are higher than the sector average (2.28%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-2.52%) is higher than the sector average (-3.67%).
Disadvantages
- Price (15.11 $) is higher than fair price (5.34 $)
- Current debt level 32.07% has increased over 5 years from 22.04%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.86%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=12.46%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Smith & Nephew plc | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.8% | -7.9% | 0.6% |
| 90 days | 5.4% | -8.9% | 19.2% |
| 1 year | -2.5% | -3.7% | 14.2% |
SNNUF vs Sector: Smith & Nephew plc has outperformed the "Healthcare" sector by 1.15% over the past year.
SNNUF vs Market: Smith & Nephew plc has significantly underperformed the market by -16.68% over the past year.
Stable price: SNNUF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: SNNUF with weekly volatility of -0.0484% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (15.11 $) is higher than the fair price (5.34 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (15.11 $) is 64.7% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (27.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (54.24).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (27.17) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.13) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.2).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.13) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.93) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.62).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.93) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (11.38) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.71).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (11.38) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -1.61% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-1.61%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0.5351%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.86%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.46%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.86%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.05%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.23%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.05%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.34%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.55% is higher than the average for the sector '2.28%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.55% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.55% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (79.37%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
