MAX
Company Analysis Koninklijke Philips N.V.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (4.37%) are higher than the sector average (1.68%).
- The stock's return over the last year (42.08%) is higher than the sector average (-46.12%).
Disadvantages
- Price (33 $) is higher than fair price (8.44 $)
- Current debt level 25.85% has increased over 5 years from 25.02%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-5.84%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=13.9%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 12.7% | 0.2% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | 23.9% | -35.5% | 2.7% |
| 1 year | 42.1% | -46.1% | 12.7% |
RYLPF vs Sector: Koninklijke Philips N.V. has outperformed the "Healthcare" sector by 88.2% over the past year.
RYLPF vs Market: Koninklijke Philips N.V. has outperformed the market by 29.38% over the past year.
Stable price: RYLPF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: RYLPF with weekly volatility of 0.81% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (33 $) is higher than the fair price (8.44 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (33 $) is 74.4% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-36.68) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.63).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-36.68) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.39).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.88) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.61).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.88) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.21).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.26) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.92).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.26) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.13).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (14.45) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.58).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (14.45) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.81).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -24.23% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-24.23%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-47.93%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-5.84%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.9%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-5.84%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.67%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-2.4%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.42%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-2.4%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (35.41%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (17.97%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (14.44%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (17.97%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 4.37% is higher than the average for the sector '1.68%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 4.37% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.86.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 4.37% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (157.41%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
