Company Analysis Rural Funds Group
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (10.61%) are higher than the sector average (3.95%).
- The stock's return over the last year (20%) is higher than the sector average (6.61%).
Disadvantages
- Price (1.28 $) is higher than fair price (0.55 $)
- Current debt level 42.51% has increased over 5 years from 32.91%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=2.96%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=7.54%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Rural Funds Group | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -6.1% | 0% | 0.2% |
| 90 days | -6.1% | -0.7% | 4.3% |
| 1 year | 20% | 6.6% | 19.4% |
RFNDF vs Sector: Rural Funds Group has outperformed the "Real Estate" sector by 13.39% over the past year.
RFNDF vs Market: Rural Funds Group has outperformed the market by 0.59% over the past year.
Stable price: RFNDF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: RFNDF with weekly volatility of 0.38% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1.28 $) is higher than the fair price (0.55 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1.28 $) is 57% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (14.86) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (6.66).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (14.86) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.85).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.44) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0.53).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.44) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.38).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (4.1) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.35).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (4.1) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.4).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (21.31) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (20.24).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (21.31) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.93).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -14.79% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-14.79%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (8.87%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (2.96%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.54%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (2.96%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.21%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.65%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.31%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.65%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.06%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (8.54%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.7%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (8.54%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.78%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 10.61% is higher than the average for the sector '3.95%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 10.61% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 10.61% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (144.87%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
