Company Analysis PUMA SE
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (25.84 $) is less than fair price (45.36 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (2.33%) are below the sector average (3.88%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-40.07%) is lower than the sector average (-0.4058%).
- Current debt level 24.08% has increased over 5 years from 18.21%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=10.96%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=18.44%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
PUMA SE | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 2.1% | -0% | 0.6% |
90 days | 20.2% | -0.9% | 19.2% |
1 year | -40.1% | -0.4% | 14.2% |
PMMAF vs Sector: PUMA SE has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -39.67% over the past year.
PMMAF vs Market: PUMA SE has significantly underperformed the market by -54.24% over the past year.
Stable price: PMMAF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: PMMAF with weekly volatility of -0.7707% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (25.84 $) is lower than the fair price (45.36 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (25.84 $) is 75.5% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (22.77) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (25.12).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (22.77) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.27) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.67).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.27) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.7272) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.75).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.7272) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.94) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.13).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (7.94) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 61.32% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (61.32%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.09%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (10.96%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.44%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (10.96%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (4.28%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.43%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (4.28%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.14%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.33% is below the average for the sector '3.88%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.33% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.33% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 3 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (43.61%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription