Company Analysis Pacific Century Premium Developments Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.0041 $) is less than fair price (0.0147 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (3.95%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-82.4%) is lower than the sector average (-6.52%).
- Current debt level 90.65% has increased over 5 years from 63.37%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-10.9%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=7.54%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Pacific Century Premium Developments Limited | Real Estate | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -14% | 0.9% |
| 90 days | -72.5% | -13.2% | 2.3% |
| 1 year | -82.4% | -6.5% | 14.5% |
PCPDF vs Sector: Pacific Century Premium Developments Limited has significantly underperformed the "Real Estate" sector by -75.88% over the past year.
PCPDF vs Market: Pacific Century Premium Developments Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -96.89% over the past year.
Slightly volatile price: PCPDF is more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical deviations of about +/- 5-15% per week.
Long period: PCPDF with weekly volatility of -1.58% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.0041 $) is lower than the fair price (0.0147 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.0041 $) is 258.5% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-0.16) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.73).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-0.16) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.32).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (4.8) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0.53).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (4.8) is higher than that of the market as a whole (4.21).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.35) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.39).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.35) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.16).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (30.12) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (20.19).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (30.12) is higher than that of the market as a whole (24.82).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -19.28% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-19.28%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (8.84%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-10.9%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.54%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-10.9%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.67%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-0.47%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.31%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-0.47%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (35.5%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.7%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '3.95%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
