Company Analysis Neo Performance Materials Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (44.44%) is higher than the sector average (1.67%).
Disadvantages
- Price (6.74 $) is higher than fair price (6.57 $)
- Dividends (5.78%) are below the sector average (9.03%).
- Current debt level 10.93% has increased over 5 years from 0.8848%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-3.1%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.47%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Neo Performance Materials Inc. | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.4% | -2% | -0.1% |
| 90 days | 21.4% | 8.3% | 6.8% |
| 1 year | 44.4% | 1.7% | 10.9% |
NOPMF vs Sector: Neo Performance Materials Inc. has outperformed the "Materials" sector by 42.77% over the past year.
NOPMF vs Market: Neo Performance Materials Inc. has outperformed the market by 33.54% over the past year.
Stable price: NOPMF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: NOPMF with weekly volatility of 0.8546% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (6.74 $) is higher than the fair price (6.57 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (6.74 $) is 2.5% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (11.24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (191.66).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (11.24) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.91).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.5691) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.84).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.5691) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.41).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.4843) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.22).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.4843) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.65).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.26) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (49.68).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (9.26) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.07).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -15.76% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-15.76%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-14.87%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-3.1%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.47%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-3.1%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.61%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-2.02%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.69%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-2.02%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.37%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.26%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.01%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 5.78% is below the average for the sector '9.03%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 5.78% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 5.78% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (51.65%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
