Company Analysis Mountain Valley MD Holdings Inc
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.0139 $) is less than fair price (0.0191 $)
- Current debt level 0% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 4.47%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (9.2%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-36.24%) is lower than the sector average (-8.79%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-294.87%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=13.21%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Mountain Valley MD Holdings Inc | Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -0% | -0.5% |
| 90 days | -2.1% | -0.4% | 1.7% |
| 1 year | -36.2% | -8.8% | 13.6% |
MVMDF vs Sector: Mountain Valley MD Holdings Inc has significantly underperformed the "" sector by -27.45% over the past year.
MVMDF vs Market: Mountain Valley MD Holdings Inc has significantly underperformed the market by -49.8% over the past year.
Stable price: MVMDF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MVMDF with weekly volatility of -0.7% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.0139 $) is lower than the fair price (0.0191 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.0139 $) is 37.4% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (-0.66) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.39).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (-0.66) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.81).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.93) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.93) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.36).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (99.95) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.43).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (99.95) is higher than that of the market as a whole (12.38).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (0).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.84).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -1.65% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-1.65%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (877.83%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-294.87%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.21%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-294.87%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.27%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-272.4%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.13%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-272.4%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.08%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (0%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.72%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '9.2%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
