Company Analysis MGM China Holdings Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (4.68%) are higher than the sector average (3.01%).
- The stock's return over the last year (72.73%) is higher than the sector average (-0.3277%).
Disadvantages
- Price (1.9 $) is higher than fair price (1.85 $)
- Current debt level 75.45% has increased over 5 years from 51.79%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-93.61%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=40.22%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
MGM China Holdings Limited | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -8.7% | -1.1% | 0.6% |
90 days | 20.3% | -0.4% | 8.5% |
1 year | 72.7% | -0.3% | 16.7% |
MCHVF vs Sector: MGM China Holdings Limited has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 73.05% over the past year.
MCHVF vs Market: MGM China Holdings Limited has outperformed the market by 55.99% over the past year.
Stable price: MCHVF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: MCHVF with weekly volatility of 1.4% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1.9 $) is higher than the fair price (1.85 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1.9 $) is 2.6% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (6.76) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (21.52).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (6.76) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.4).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (59.02) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (59.02) is higher than that of the market as a whole (6.85).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.992) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.48).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.992) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.61).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.1) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.58).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.1) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.37).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -22.26% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (-0.9108%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-22.26%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (-0.9108%) is lower than the return for the sector (113.17%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-93.61%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.22%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-93.61%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.72%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.56%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.54%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.56%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.04%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.92%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.91%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 4.68% is higher than the average for the sector '3.01%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 4.68% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 4.68% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (57.82%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription