Company Analysis Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (0.07 $) is higher than fair price (0.0543 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (11.38%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-30%) is lower than the sector average (-13.84%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-6.67%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=13.68%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. | Industrials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 5% | -4.2% | 1.9% |
| 90 days | -16% | -49.8% | 4.9% |
| 1 year | -30% | -13.8% | 24.9% |
LQMT vs Sector: Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Industrials" sector by -16.16% over the past year.
LQMT vs Market: Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -54.93% over the past year.
Stable price: LQMT is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LQMT with weekly volatility of -0.5769% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (0.07 $) is higher than the fair price (0.0543 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (0.07 $) is 22.4% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (43.13).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (46.99).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.8) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.15).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.8) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.99).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (107.92) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.26).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (107.92) is higher than that of the market as a whole (4.88).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (123.12).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.22).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -4.25% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-4.25%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-48.47%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-6.67%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.68%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-6.67%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.21%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-6.43%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (5.05%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-6.43%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.86%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.31%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.03%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '11.38%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
