Company Analysis Leo Lithium Limited
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.085 $) is less than fair price (0.1358 $)
- Dividends (172.33%) are higher than the sector average (9.56%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=104.72%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=11.42%)
Disadvantages
- The stock's return over the last year (-48.48%) is lower than the sector average (-0.628%).
- Current debt level 0.1927% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Leo Lithium Limited | Materials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -0% | -2.3% | -0.6% |
| 90 days | -11.5% | 5.7% | 5.7% |
| 1 year | -48.5% | -0.6% | 9% |
LLLAF vs Sector: Leo Lithium Limited has significantly underperformed the "Materials" sector by -47.86% over the past year.
LLLAF vs Market: Leo Lithium Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -57.45% over the past year.
Stable price: LLLAF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LLLAF with weekly volatility of -0.9324% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.085 $) is lower than the fair price (0.1358 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.085 $) is 59.8% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0.5117) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (191.53).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0.5117) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.3537) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.86).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.3537) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (32.59) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (7.23).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (32.59) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-23.08) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (61.51).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-23.08) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -8634634.55% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-8634634.55%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-12.96%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (104.72%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (11.42%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (104.72%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (102.63%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (5.69%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (102.63%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.26%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 172.33% is higher than the average for the sector '9.56%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 172.33% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=1.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 172.33% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
