Company Analysis Lifeist Wellness Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.031 $) is less than fair price (0.0429 $)
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (8.07%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-36.73%) is lower than the sector average (-8.93%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-38.39%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=17.17%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Lifeist Wellness Inc. | Index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -0.1% | -0.7% |
| 90 days | -39.2% | -0.1% | 2.1% |
| 1 year | -36.7% | -8.9% | 13.7% |
LFSWF vs Sector: Lifeist Wellness Inc. has significantly underperformed the "" sector by -27.81% over the past year.
LFSWF vs Market: Lifeist Wellness Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -50.4% over the past year.
Stable price: LFSWF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: LFSWF with weekly volatility of -0.71% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.031 $) is lower than the fair price (0.0429 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (0.031 $) is 38.4% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (20.81).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (47.32).
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.47) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.91).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.47) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.21).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.24) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.54).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.24) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.16).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (177.42).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.82).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -18.79% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-18.79%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (1006.39%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-38.39%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.17%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-38.39%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.67%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-15.6%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.87%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-15.6%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (35.5%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (46.45%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '8.07%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
