Company Analysis KP Tissue Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (13.6%) are higher than the sector average (13.34%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-16.44%) is higher than the sector average (-31.32%).
Disadvantages
- Price (6.25 $) is higher than fair price (1.63 $)
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-7.22%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=11.99%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| KP Tissue Inc. | Consumer Staples | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -2.6% | 2.9% |
| 90 days | -9.7% | -33.7% | 2.4% |
| 1 year | -16.4% | -31.3% | 26.4% |
KPTSF vs Sector: KP Tissue Inc. has outperformed the "Consumer Staples" sector by 14.88% over the past year.
KPTSF vs Market: KP Tissue Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -42.85% over the past year.
Stable price: KPTSF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: KPTSF with weekly volatility of -0.3162% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (6.25 $) is higher than the fair price (1.63 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (6.25 $) is 73.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (33.9).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (46.99).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.31) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.13).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.31) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.99).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.42).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.88).
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.43).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.22).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 30.56% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (30.56%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-31.79%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-7.22%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.99%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-7.22%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.21%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-6.99%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.92%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-6.99%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.86%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.7%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.03%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 13.6% is higher than the average for the sector '13.34%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 13.6% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 13.6% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
