Company Analysis Green Thumb Industries Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (5.62 $) is higher than fair price (2.14 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.56%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-62.53%) is lower than the sector average (-1.49%).
- Current debt level 12.39% has increased over 5 years from 0.0177%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=2.13%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=13.38%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
Green Thumb Industries Inc. | Healthcare | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -8.9% | -11.3% | 0.6% |
90 days | -27.4% | 3.8% | -4.3% |
1 year | -62.5% | -1.5% | 9.3% |
GTBIF vs Sector: Green Thumb Industries Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -61.05% over the past year.
GTBIF vs Market: Green Thumb Industries Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -71.82% over the past year.
Stable price: GTBIF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: GTBIF with weekly volatility of -1.2% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (5.62 $) is higher than the fair price (2.14 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (5.62 $) is 61.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (68.8) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (31.37).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (68.8) is higher than that of the market as a whole (53.47).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.46) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.11).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.46) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.34).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.37) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.24).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.37) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.74).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (16.22) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (10.17).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (16.22) is lower than that of the market as a whole (28.31).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -56.27% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-56.27%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-30.82%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (2.13%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.38%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (2.13%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.79%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.46%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.25%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.46%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (16.49%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (6.2%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.56%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (6.2%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.03%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.56%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (16.64%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription