Company Analysis Molten Ventures Plc
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (-18.87%) is higher than the sector average (-45.96%).
Disadvantages
- Price (4.06 $) is higher than fair price (0.6528 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (6.7%).
- Current debt level 6.57% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-3.32%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=131.96%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Molten Ventures Plc | Financials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 17.8% | 0.2% | -0.1% |
90 days | 17.8% | -0.1% | 6.8% |
1 year | -18.9% | -46% | 10.9% |
GRWXF vs Sector: Molten Ventures Plc has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 27.09% over the past year.
GRWXF vs Market: Molten Ventures Plc has significantly underperformed the market by -29.76% over the past year.
Stable price: GRWXF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: GRWXF with weekly volatility of -0.3628% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (4.06 $) is higher than the fair price (0.6528 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (4.06 $) is 83.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (4.03) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.24).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (4.03) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.91).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.4132) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.73).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.4132) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.41).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (-10.81) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.2).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (-10.81) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.65).
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-11.01) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (120.44).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-11.01) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.07).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -40.45% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-40.45%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-8.5%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-3.32%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (131.96%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-3.32%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.61%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-3.03%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (118.35%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-3.03%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.37%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.3%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.01%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '6.7%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (8.35%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription