Max Chat
Company Analysis Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (2.8 $) is less than fair price (2.82 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (0%) is higher than the sector average (-1.2%).
- Current debt level 134.02% has decreased over 5 years from 199.69%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (3.88%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=13.72%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=18.44%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Galaxy Gaming, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0.7% | -0.6% | -0.3% |
| 90 days | 2.6% | -1.2% | 17.4% |
| 1 year | 0% | -1.2% | 11.1% |
GLXZ vs Sector: Galaxy Gaming, Inc. has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 1.2% over the past year.
GLXZ vs Market: Galaxy Gaming, Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -11.13% over the past year.
Stable price: GLXZ is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: GLXZ with weekly volatility of 0% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (2.8 $) is lower than the fair price (2.82 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (2.8 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 0.7%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (25.12).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (-3.43) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.67).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (-3.43) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.17) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.75).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.17) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.13).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 3.88% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (3.88%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.09%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (13.72%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.44%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (13.72%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-6.45%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.43%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-6.45%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.14%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '3.88%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
