Company Analysis Glass House Brands Inc.
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (4.94 $) is higher than fair price (0.0904 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (2.28%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-37.5%) is lower than the sector average (-3.67%).
- Current debt level 18.74% has increased over 5 years from 0%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0.5039%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=12.46%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Glass House Brands Inc. | Healthcare | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | -7.4% | -7.9% | 0.6% |
90 days | 14.9% | -8.9% | 19.2% |
1 year | -37.5% | -3.7% | 14.2% |
GLASF vs Sector: Glass House Brands Inc. has significantly underperformed the "Healthcare" sector by -33.83% over the past year.
GLASF vs Market: Glass House Brands Inc. has significantly underperformed the market by -51.67% over the past year.
Stable price: GLASF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: GLASF with weekly volatility of -0.7212% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (4.94 $) is higher than the fair price (0.0904 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (4.94 $) is 98.2% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (852.35) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (54.24).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (852.35) is higher than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.7) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.2).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.7) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.62).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.71).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -20.62% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-20.62%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (0.5351%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0.5039%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.46%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0.5039%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.169%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (6.23%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.169%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.34%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '2.28%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (1493.06%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription