Company Analysis Glass House Brands Inc.
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (38.85%) is higher than the sector average (18.91%).
- Current debt level 18.74% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 28.31%.
Disadvantages
- Price (9.11 $) is higher than fair price (0.11 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (1.67%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0.5%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=13.9%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Glass House Brands Inc. | Healthcare | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -6.4% | 0% | -1.8% |
| 90 days | 40.8% | 3.1% | 0.3% |
| 1 year | 38.8% | 18.9% | 13.7% |
GLASF vs Sector: Glass House Brands Inc. has outperformed the "Healthcare" sector by 19.94% over the past year.
GLASF vs Market: Glass House Brands Inc. has outperformed the market by 25.17% over the past year.
Stable price: GLASF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: GLASF with weekly volatility of 0.75% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (9.11 $) is higher than the fair price (0.11 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (9.11 $) is 98.8% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (852.35) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (40.78).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (852.35) is higher than that of the market as a whole (47.32).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.7) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.63).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.7) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.21).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.94).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.16).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.62).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.82).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -20.23% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-20.23%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-47.93%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0.5%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.9%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0.5%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (50.67%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.17%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.42%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.17%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (35.5%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (14.44%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.96%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '1.67%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (1493.06%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
