Company Analysis Federal National Mortgage Association
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (24 $) is less than fair price (57.42 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (60%) is higher than the sector average (0%).
- Current debt level 97.2% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 98.97%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (4.61%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=19.7%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=100.46%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Federal National Mortgage Association | Financials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 9.1% | -14.6% | 0.2% |
90 days | 14.3% | -13.7% | 10.8% |
1 year | 60% | 0% | 15.2% |
FNMFM vs Sector: Federal National Mortgage Association has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 60% over the past year.
FNMFM vs Market: Federal National Mortgage Association has outperformed the market by 44.78% over the past year.
Stable price: FNMFM is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FNMFM with weekly volatility of 1.15% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (24 $) is lower than the fair price (57.42 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (24 $) is 139.3% lower than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (5.88) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (54.53).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (5.88) is lower than that of the market as a whole (48.33).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.06) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.72).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.06) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.63).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.22) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (2.8).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.22) is lower than that of the market as a whole (13.27).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (29.98) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (141.09).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (29.98) is lower than that of the market as a whole (42.28).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 16958% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (16958%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.74%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (19.7%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (100.46%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (19.7%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.15%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.3914%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (84.78%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.3914%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (35.9%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.61%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.83%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '4.61%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.7.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription