MAX
Company Analysis Federal National Mortgage Association
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (12.7 $) is less than fair price (58.83 $)
- Current debt level 97.2% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 98.75%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (4.45%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-11.99%) is lower than the sector average (10.5%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=19.7%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=59.96%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Federal National Mortgage Association | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.9% | -27.2% | -1.6% |
| 90 days | -15.9% | 47.1% | -2.3% |
| 1 year | -12% | 10.5% | 11.7% |
FNMAS vs Sector: Federal National Mortgage Association has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -22.49% over the past year.
FNMAS vs Market: Federal National Mortgage Association has significantly underperformed the market by -23.71% over the past year.
Stable price: FNMAS is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FNMAS with weekly volatility of -0.23% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (12.7 $) is lower than the fair price (58.83 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (12.7 $) is 363.2% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0.8) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (54.1).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0.8) is lower than that of the market as a whole (38.45).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.14) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.57).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.14) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.23).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.44) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.37).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.44) is lower than that of the market as a whole (12.17).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (64.28).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.93).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -4.69% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-4.69%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-47.75%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (19.7%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (59.96%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (19.7%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (37.59%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.39%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (44.97%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.39%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (35.27%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (11.35%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.85%).
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '4.45%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.67.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 2 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Based on sources: porti.ru
