Company Analysis Federal National Mortgage Association
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (276%) is higher than the sector average (-28.35%).
- Current debt level 97.63% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 98.97%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=22.41%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=-43.79%)
Disadvantages
- Price (18.8 $) is higher than fair price (12.8 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (8.58%).
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Federal National Mortgage Association | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -3.9% | -1.4% | 1.9% |
| 90 days | 161.1% | 2.8% | 4.9% |
| 1 year | 276% | -28.3% | 24.9% |
FNMAM vs Sector: Federal National Mortgage Association has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 304.35% over the past year.
FNMAM vs Market: Federal National Mortgage Association has outperformed the market by 251.07% over the past year.
Slightly volatile price: FNMAM is more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical deviations of about +/- 5-15% per week.
Long period: FNMAM with weekly volatility of 5.31% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (18.8 $) is higher than the fair price (12.8 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (18.8 $) is 31.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0.3133) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (27.95).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0.3133) is lower than that of the market as a whole (46.99).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.0702) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-29.58).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.0702) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.99).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.18) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.66).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.18) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.88).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-75.72).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (25.22).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 17388% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (17388%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (85.96%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (22.41%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (-43.79%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (22.41%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-8.21%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.4025%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.08%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.4025%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.86%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.34%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.03%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '8.58%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
