Company Analysis Federal National Mortgage Association
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (9.57 $) is less than fair price (33.63 $)
- The stock's return over the last year (636.15%) is higher than the sector average (2.6%).
- Current debt level 97.2% is below 100% and has decreased over 5 years from 98.97%.
Disadvantages
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (4.73%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=19.7%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=101.03%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Federal National Mortgage Association | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -13% | 0% | 0.3% |
| 90 days | -14.6% | 4% | 5% |
| 1 year | 636.2% | 2.6% | 12.5% |
FNMA vs Sector: Federal National Mortgage Association has outperformed the "Financials" sector by 633.56% over the past year.
FNMA vs Market: Federal National Mortgage Association has outperformed the market by 623.7% over the past year.
Stable price: FNMA is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: FNMA with weekly volatility of 12.23% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (9.57 $) is lower than the fair price (33.63 $).
Price significantly below the fair price: The current price (9.57 $) is 251.4% lower than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (0.2312) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (53.04).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (0.2312) is lower than that of the market as a whole (45.44).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.0415) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.61).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.0415) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.41).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.1272) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.52).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.1272) is lower than that of the market as a whole (13.03).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (65.93).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.02).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 16958% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (16958%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-1.27%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (19.7%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (101.03%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (19.7%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.16%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.3914%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (85.19%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.3914%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.09%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.55%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.79%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '4.73%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 0% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.71.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
