Company Analysis Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
1. Summary
Advantages
- Dividends (3.32%) are higher than the sector average (1.85%).
- The stock's return over the last year (16.71%) is higher than the sector average (-25.44%).
Disadvantages
- Price (9.5 $) is higher than fair price (0.0208 $)
- Current debt level 15.57% has increased over 5 years from 14.47%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=0.0207%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=39.58%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Technology | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -2.3% | 25.7% | -0.5% |
| 90 days | 20.9% | -17.5% | 3.7% |
| 1 year | 16.7% | -25.4% | 13% |
ERIXF vs Sector: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) has outperformed the "Technology" sector by 42.15% over the past year.
ERIXF vs Market: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) has outperformed the market by 3.68% over the past year.
Stable price: ERIXF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: ERIXF with weekly volatility of 0.3213% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
5. Fundamental Analysis
5.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (9.5 $) is higher than the fair price (0.0208 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (9.5 $) is 99.8% higher than the fair price.
5.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (14831.93) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (171.22).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (14831.93) is higher than that of the market as a whole (45.44).
5.2.1 P/E Similar companies
5.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.19) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.08).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.19) is lower than that of the market as a whole (4.4).
5.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
5.5. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.2) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (125.88).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.2) is lower than that of the market as a whole (13.03).
5.5.1 P/S Similar companies
5.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (18.46) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (15.56).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (18.46) is lower than that of the market as a whole (24.02).
6. Profitability
6.1. Profitability and revenue
6.2. Earnings per share - EPS
6.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -19.98% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-19.98%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-27.53%).
6.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (0.0207%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (39.58%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (0.0207%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.15%).
6.6. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.0068%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.33%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.0068%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.09%).
6.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (15.75%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (13.84%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (15.75%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (10.88%).
8. Dividends
8.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 3.32% is higher than the average for the sector '1.85%.
8.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 3.32% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 3.32% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
8.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (46165%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
Based on sources: porti.ru
