Company Analysis Dr. Martens plc
1. Summary
Advantages
- The stock's return over the last year (24%) is higher than the sector average (-22.41%).
Disadvantages
- Price (2.48 $) is higher than fair price (0.0763 $)
- Dividends (1.84%) are below the sector average (3.01%).
- Current debt level 45.41% has increased over 5 years from 16.5%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=1.23%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=40.22%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Dr. Martens plc | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 2.8% | -22.9% | 1.3% |
| 90 days | 30.5% | -22.9% | 8.2% |
| 1 year | 24% | -22.4% | 17.8% |
DRMTY vs Sector: Dr. Martens plc has outperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by 46.41% over the past year.
DRMTY vs Market: Dr. Martens plc has outperformed the market by 6.21% over the past year.
Stable price: DRMTY is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: DRMTY with weekly volatility of 0.4615% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (2.48 $) is higher than the fair price (0.0763 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (2.48 $) is 96.9% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (268.42) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (21.52).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (268.42) is higher than that of the market as a whole (50.4).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (3.3) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (3.09).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (3.3) is lower than that of the market as a whole (6.85).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.53) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.48).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.53) is lower than that of the market as a whole (15.61).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (8.21) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (12.58).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (8.21) is lower than that of the market as a whole (27.37).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -18.8% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (-93.5%) is below the 5-year average return (-18.8%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (-93.5%) is lower than the return for the sector (113.17%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (1.23%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (40.22%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (1.23%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (51.72%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (0.5057%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.54%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (0.5057%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (36.04%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (9.4%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.92%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (9.4%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.91%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.84% is below the average for the sector '3.01%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.84% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.9.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.84% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (211.11%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
