Company Analysis Dr. Martens plc
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (1.44 $) is higher than fair price (0.694 $)
- Dividends (2.99%) are below the sector average (4.06%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-35.69%) is lower than the sector average (-2.92%).
- Current debt level 49.2% has increased over 5 years from 16.5%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=17.92%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=18.25%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Dr. Martens plc | Consumer Cyclical | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0% | -2% | 2.1% |
| 90 days | -17.7% | -3.4% | 7.6% |
| 1 year | -35.7% | -2.9% | 12.5% |
DRMTY vs Sector: Dr. Martens plc has significantly underperformed the "Consumer Cyclical" sector by -32.77% over the past year.
DRMTY vs Market: Dr. Martens plc has significantly underperformed the market by -48.14% over the past year.
Stable price: DRMTY is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: DRMTY with weekly volatility of -0.6863% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (1.44 $) is higher than the fair price (0.694 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (1.44 $) is 51.8% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (23.91) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (28.87).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (23.91) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.99).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (4.49) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.41).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (4.49) is higher than that of the market as a whole (3.41).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.89) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.95).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.89) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.65).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.25) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (17.48).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (10.25) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.09).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -1.5% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-1.5%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-9%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (17.92%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (18.25%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (17.92%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.13%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (7.12%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (7.33%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (7.12%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.31%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (25.52%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (12.64%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (25.52%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (11.01%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.99% is below the average for the sector '4.06%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.99% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.9.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.99% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (83.53%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
