Company Analysis Countryside Properties PLC
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (3.7 $) is higher than fair price (2.88 $)
- Dividends (0%) are below the sector average (13.86%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-42.55%) is lower than the sector average (-33.9%).
- Current debt level 16% has increased over 5 years from 0.209%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=-11.42%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=13.49%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.2. News
2.3. Market efficiency
| Countryside Properties PLC | Industrials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 52.3% | -0.5% | 0.7% |
| 90 days | 11.4% | -37.4% | 12% |
| 1 year | -42.5% | -33.9% | 32.4% |
CSPLF vs Sector: Countryside Properties PLC has significantly underperformed the "Industrials" sector by -8.65% over the past year.
CSPLF vs Market: Countryside Properties PLC has significantly underperformed the market by -74.97% over the past year.
Stable price: CSPLF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CSPLF with weekly volatility of -0.8182% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (3.7 $) is higher than the fair price (2.88 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (3.7 $) is 22.2% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (13.39) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (41.38).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (13.39) is lower than that of the market as a whole (53.07).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.15) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.95).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.15) is higher than that of the market as a whole (-9.1).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (0.82) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.14).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (0.82) is lower than that of the market as a whole (5.18).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (-14.79) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (122.94).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (-14.79) is lower than that of the market as a whole (23.95).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -33.86% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-33.86%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-4.1%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (-11.42%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (13.49%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (-11.42%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (-2.01%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (-1.23%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (4.96%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (-1.23%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (8.98%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (-8.63%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.31%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (-8.63%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (11.03%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 0% is below the average for the sector '13.86%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Unstable dividends: The company's dividend yield 0% has not been consistently paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 0% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
