Max Chat
Company Analysis Cashmere Valley Bank
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (67.8 $) is higher than fair price (64.4 $)
- Dividends (2.86%) are below the sector average (6.7%).
- The stock's return over the last year (23.2%) is lower than the sector average (43.26%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=13.83%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=131.98%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Cashmere Valley Bank | Financials | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | -1.4% | 39.7% | 1.6% |
| 90 days | 11.9% | 41.5% | 23% |
| 1 year | 23.2% | 43.3% | 13% |
CSHX vs Sector: Cashmere Valley Bank has significantly underperformed the "Financials" sector by -20.06% over the past year.
CSHX vs Market: Cashmere Valley Bank has outperformed the market by 10.16% over the past year.
Stable price: CSHX is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CSHX with weekly volatility of 0.4462% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (67.8 $) is higher than the fair price (64.4 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (67.8 $) is 5% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (6.92) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (19.24).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (6.92) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (0.9547) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (1.73).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (0.9547) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (2.42) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.2).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (2.42) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (120.44).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (0) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 1.95% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (1.95%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-6.77%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (13.83%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (131.98%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (13.83%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (1.37%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (118.36%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (1.37%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.29%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 2.86% is below the average for the sector '6.7%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 2.86% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.93.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 2.86% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 1 year.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (23.6%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
