Max Chat
Company Analysis Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust
1. Summary
Advantages
- Price (0.41 $) is less than fair price (0.4362 $)
- Dividends (19.33%) are higher than the sector average (9.46%).
- The stock's return over the last year (6.02%) is higher than the sector average (0%).
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=78.87%) is higher than the sector average (ROE=10.61%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
| Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust | Energy | Index | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 4.8% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| 90 days | 6.8% | 3.7% | 15.8% |
| 1 year | 6% | 0% | 11.6% |
CHKR vs Sector: Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust has outperformed the "Energy" sector by 6.02% over the past year.
CHKR vs Market: Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust has significantly underperformed the market by -5.6% over the past year.
Stable price: CHKR is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: CHKR with weekly volatility of 0.1158% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Below fair price: The current price (0.41 $) is lower than the fair price (0.4362 $).
Price not significantly lower than the fair price: The current price (0.41 $) is slightly lower than the fair price by 6.4%.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (4.91) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (16.56).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (4.91) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (2.75) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.15).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (2.75) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (3.22) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (1.21).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (3.22) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (3) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (28.96).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (3) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Rising and has grown by 4.86% over the last 5 years.
Earnings Slowdown: The last year's return (0%) is below the 5-year average return (4.86%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) is lower than the return for the sector (76.75%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (78.87%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (10.61%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (78.87%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (78.87%) is higher than that of the sector as a whole (4.82%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (78.87%) is higher than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.81%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
High yield: The dividend yield of the company 19.33% is higher than the average for the sector '9.46%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 19.33% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.79.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 19.33% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 0 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (0%) are at an uncomfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription
