Company Analysis Black Diamond Group Limited
1. Summary
Disadvantages
- Price (7.02 $) is higher than fair price (5.57 $)
- Dividends (1.85%) are below the sector average (4.86%).
- The stock's return over the last year (-6.77%) is lower than the sector average (6.63%).
- Current debt level 35.69% has increased over 5 years from 29.9%.
- The company's current efficiency (ROE=7.25%) is lower than the sector average (ROE=22.44%)
Similar companies
2. Share price and performance
2.1. Share price
2.3. Market efficiency
Black Diamond Group Limited | Industrials | Index | |
---|---|---|---|
7 days | 2% | -0.5% | 1.6% |
90 days | 18.4% | 4.1% | 23% |
1 year | -6.8% | 6.6% | 13% |
BDIMF vs Sector: Black Diamond Group Limited has significantly underperformed the "Industrials" sector by -13.4% over the past year.
BDIMF vs Market: Black Diamond Group Limited has significantly underperformed the market by -19.81% over the past year.
Stable price: BDIMF is not significantly more volatile than the rest of the market on "OTC" over the last 3 months, with typical variations of +/- 5% per week.
Long period: BDIMF with weekly volatility of -0.1302% over the past year.
3. Summary of the report
4. Fundamental Analysis
4.1. Stock price and price forecast
Above fair price: The current price (7.02 $) is higher than the fair price (5.57 $).
Price is higher than fair: The current price (7.02 $) is 20.7% higher than the fair price.
4.2. P/E
P/E vs Sector: The company's P/E (22.41) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (34.5).
P/E vs Market: The company's P/E (22.41) is lower than that of the market as a whole (59.87).
4.2.1 P/E Similar companies
4.3. P/BV
P/BV vs Sector: The company's P/BV (1.76) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (3.57).
P/BV vs Market: The company's P/BV (1.76) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.17).
4.3.1 P/BV Similar companies
4.4. P/S
P/S vs Sector: The company's P/S indicator (1.43) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (2.39).
P/S vs Market: The company's P/S indicator (1.43) is lower than that of the market as a whole (3.43).
4.4.1 P/S Similar companies
4.5. EV/Ebitda
EV/Ebitda vs Sector: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.98) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (15.37).
EV/Ebitda vs Market: The company's EV/Ebitda (6.98) is lower than that of the market as a whole (40.12).
5. Profitability
5.1. Profitability and revenue
5.2. Earnings per share - EPS
5.3. Past profitability Net Income
Yield Trend: Negative and has fallen by -190% over the last 5 years.
Accelerating profitability: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the average return for 5 years (-190%).
Profitability vs Sector: The return for the last year (0%) exceeds the return for the sector (-7.04%).
5.4. ROE
ROE vs Sector: The company's ROE (7.25%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (22.44%).
ROE vs Market: The company's ROE (7.25%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (41.73%).
5.5. ROA
ROA vs Sector: The company's ROA (3.19%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (8.8%).
ROA vs Market: The company's ROA (3.19%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (29.55%).
5.6. ROIC
ROIC vs Sector: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the sector as a whole (10.37%).
ROIC vs Market: The company's ROIC (0%) is lower than that of the market as a whole (10.99%).
7. Dividends
7.1. Dividend yield vs Market
Low yield: The dividend yield of the company 1.85% is below the average for the sector '4.86%.
7.2. Stability and increase in payments
Dividend stability: The company's dividend yield 1.85% has been steadily paid over the past 7 years, DSI=0.86.
Weak dividend growth: The company's dividend yield 1.85% has been growing weakly or stagnant over the past 5 years. Growth over only 3 years.
7.3. Payout percentage
Dividend Coverage: Current payments from income (28.48%) are at a comfortable level.
Pay for your subscription
More functionality and data for company and portfolio analysis is available by subscription